Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes used in Psoriasis: results from two randomized clinical trials

نویسندگان

  • Richard Shikiar
  • Brian W Bresnahan
  • Stephen P Stone
  • Christine Thompson
  • John Koo
  • Dennis A Revicki
چکیده

BACKGROUND Two Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials were conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of weekly subcutaneous administration of efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis. Patient reported measures of psoriasis-related functionality and health-related quality of life and of psoriasis-related symptom assessments were included as part of the trials. OBJECTIVE To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the patient reported outcome measures that were used in the trials - the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment (PSA) Scale, and two itch measures, a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) itch measure. METHODS Subjects aged 18 to 70 years with moderate to severe psoriasis for at least 6 months were recruited into the two clinical trials (n = 1095). Internal consistency reliability was evaluated for all patient reported outcomes at baseline and at 12 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated by relations among the different patient reported outcomes and between the patient reported outcomes and the clinical assessments (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; Overall Lesion Severity Scale; Physician's Global Assessment of Change) assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks, as was the change over the course of the 12 week portion of the trial. RESULTS Internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.86 to 0.95 for the patient reported outcome measures. The patient reported outcome measures were all shown to have significant construct validity with respect to each other and with respect to the clinical assessments. The four measures also demonstrated significant responsiveness to change in underlying clinical status of the patients over the course of the trial, as measured by the independently assessed clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The DLQI, the PSA, VAS, and the NPF are considered useful tools for the measurement of dermatology-related limitations of functional ability and the frequency, severity and impact of psoriasis symptoms on patients' lives and psoriasis-related quality of life.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Psychometric properties of the single-item measure, severity of worst tiredness, in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to treatment change of the single-item measure, Severity of Worst Tiredness, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Data from two Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled (RA-BUILD; and active-controlled [RA-BEAM]), clinical studies of the efficacy of baricitinib in adults with moderately to severely active RA were...

متن کامل

Evaluation of the efficacy of topical Caffeine in the treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Background and aim: Psoriasis is one of the most common papulosquamous diseases that often requires long-term maintenance therapy. Long-term use of topical corticosteroids on the face and intertriginous areas will increase the risk of steroids side effects such as striae and atrophy development. A safe, effective and inexpensive modality in topical therapy of inverse psoriasis is required...

متن کامل

A Review Of Patient Reported Outcomes (Pros) In Psoriasis According To The Food And Drug Administration (Fda) Pro Guidance Criteria.

● Data from the identified articles were evaluated for fulfillment of the following criteria: literature review, clinician input, concept elicitation with patients, achievement of saturation, content validity of items assessed with patients, recall period validated with patients, response options validated with patients, item tracking matrix, conceptual framework, internal consistency reliabili...

متن کامل

The validity and responsiveness of three quality of life measures in the assessment of psoriasis patients: results of a phase II study

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PROs) measures are being used more frequently in investigational studies of treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The objective of this study was to examine the relationships among the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the EuroQOL 5D (EQ-5D) and to assess their validity, responsiveness, and estimates of minim...

متن کامل

Validity and Reliability of the Attitudes towards and Self-Reported Ability in Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire

Introduction: Evidence-Based Medicine is the proper application of the best available evidence in making health care decisions for each patient and merging personal clinical experiences with the best available clinical evidence resulted from systematic research. This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the attitudes towards and self-reported ability in evidence based medi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

دوره 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003